“If the construction of a building was essential for carrying out the activity of supplying services, such as renting or giving on lease or other transactions in respect of the building or a part thereof, which are covered by clauses (2) and (5) of Schedule II of the CGST Act, the building could be held to be a plant,” said Justices Abhay S Oka and Sanjay Karol.
This ruling is anticipated to ease the financial strain of rent on tenants occupying commercial spaces. Real estate companies stand to gain, as buildings can now be categorised as plant and machinery. Additionally, this advantage is not limited to commercial real estate; various industries will also be able to claim ITC on rentals for commercial properties. The ruling suggests that the ITC benefit will be available retroactively.
“This is an important decision that could have wide ramifications for industries, particularly hotels, infrastructure, and logistics, including warehousing. While the Supreme Court has upheld the constitutional validity of restrictions relating to input credit on construction-related procurements, it has been held that whether a building constitutes ‘plant or machinery’ needs to be examined on a case-by-case basis,” said Experts
“It means that where it falls under this category, credit would be allowed. It will be interesting to see if the government considers amending the GST laws after this decision,”
Experts believe that although the constitutional challenge was dismissed, the acceptance of the taxpayer’s submission under Section 17(5)(d) is a positive outcome, potentially lowering the financial burden on developers and fostering greater investment in commercial real estate.
“The real estate industry should carefully evaluate the implications of this ruling on ITC eligibility for outward supplies related to rental income. Given the Supreme Court’s decision, it would be prudent for the GST Council to issue clarifications allowing real estate players to claim ITC on rental income,” said Experts
Tax experts also pointed out that the question now arises whether this ruling would also apply to factory buildings, jetties, storage tanks, etc.
“The applicability will depend on the specifics of each case. In the Safari Retreats case, the petitioner retained the property and leased it out rather than using it for personal purposes. In contrast, factory buildings, storage tanks, etc. are typically used by the registered person for their own operations. Therefore, once the detailed ruling is available, it will be crucial to assess, on a case-by-case basis, whether ITC related to factory buildings, storage tanks, etc., will be allowed. If ITC is permitted, it will be important to understand the circumstances under which it can be claimed,”
Tax experts also believe that GST laws generally do not allow the benefit of input credit/set-off of GST costs incurred on the input side for the construction of civil structures/immoveable property, with very few exceptions. This often results in additional GST costs for service providers whose primary input-side investment is in immoveable property, such as malls/commercial real estate players, port or airport service providers, and LNG terminal operators.
In the case of Safari Retreats, a mall owner approached the Orissa High Court, arguing that when a mall is being built for providing commercial rental services for the shop spaces therein, there should be no restriction on availing input credit/set-off for the GST cost incurred on the said construction. The Orissa High Court upheld this argument, and the GST authorities subsequently appealed to the Supreme Court. Several similar matters eventually reached the Supreme Court, leading to the formation of a large batch of matters on this legal point. Some of these newer matters also challenged the constitutional validity of such a restriction on input GST credit. Today, the Supreme Court has pronounced its judgment—while it has rejected the constitutional validity of the restriction, it upheld the conclusions of the Orissa High Court and, among other things, held that input credit will be allowed if the construction activity is for ‘plant’ or ‘machinery’.
This is a landmark judgment by the Supreme Court. While determining whether a mall, hotel, jetty, breakwater, or warehouse qualifies as ‘plant or machinery’ will remain a factual question (potentially leading to a second round of litigation), the greatest positive is that the Court has categorically held that there is no blanket restriction against input credit/set-off of the GST cost incurred on the construction of civil structures/immoveable property, especially when the said structure itself is integral to providing the output services in question,” said Experts
Visit Our Website More Details https://deepakconsulting.in/
Fore More Blogs https://deepakconsulting.in/blog-grid/
Deepak Kumar Singh Founder & Senior Business Consultant Singh and Associates With over 6 years of comprehensive experience in the fields of taxation, accounting, and corporate law, Deepak Singh is the founder and senior consultant at **Singh and Associates**, a leading advisory firm providing a wide range of business services. Over the years, Deepak has built a solid reputation for his expertise in complex tax issues and his commitment to delivering practical, effective solutions to both businesses and individuals. Deepak’s core specialization lies in **GST (Goods and Services Tax)**, **Income Tax**, and **litigation-related matters**. His deep understanding of these areas allows him to assist clients with tax planning, compliance, and dispute resolution. He has successfully represented numerous clients in tax-related audits and legal proceedings, ensuring they navigate the intricate landscape of tax laws with ease and stay fully compliant with the latest regulations. Beyond taxation, Deepak has gained significant experience in **company incorporation** and **compliance management**. He provides end-to-end support for businesses, helping them with the process of establishing a legal entity, ensuring proper registration, and adhering to the necessary corporate governance and statutory compliance requirements. His expertise helps companies maintain smooth operations by staying on top of regulatory changes and fulfilling their legal obligations. In addition to his taxation and corporate services, Deepak has an in-depth understanding of **labor law litigation**, where he assists businesses in managing employment-related disputes. Whether handling issues related to labor contracts, employee disputes, or ensuring compliance with labor laws, Deepak helps businesses navigate these challenges to avoid potential risks and liabilities. Deepak is also highly experienced in **transfer pricing**, offering businesses advisory services on international transactions and cross-border taxation. He ensures that clients maintain compliant and tax-efficient pricing structures, minimizing their exposure to risks in the global market. As the founder of **Singh and Associates**, Deepak takes a client-centric approach, offering personalized, strategic guidance to address each client’s unique needs. His proactive approach, combined with his ability to translate complex tax and legal concepts into actionable advice, has earned him the trust of clients across various sectors. Known for his attention to detail and comprehensive knowledge of business law, Deepak is committed to providing results-oriented services that help businesses achieve financial growth while ensuring regulatory compliance. His firm, **Singh and Associates**, has established itself as a reliable partner for businesses seeking expert guidance on taxation, legal matters, and corporate compliance. Deepak is dedicated to staying updated with the latest developments in tax and business law. His ongoing commitment to professional growth ensures that Singh and Associates remains at the forefront of industry trends, offering innovative and compliant solutions to meet the evolving needs of businesses in today’s competitive landscape.